As stated in our first blog, Learnist bears some resemblance in aim and material to Wikipedia, the now-dominant online, user-sourced encyclopedia.
Does Wikipedia present competition to Learnist? In other words, would people normally look for the same material on Wikipedia? Furthermore, is it easier to access material on Wikipedia than on Learnist, especially when using a search engine to locate information on a subject?
In answer to these questions, Wikipedia is real competition for Learnist with some common searches used by students. Example: the search term, “Roman Empire” shows the Wiki article at the top of the search list, and Learnist doesn’t show on the first, second or third pages. You get the same results for search terms ‘Biology,’ ‘Algebra,’ and ‘Advertising.’ Given that Learnist is about education and these are common education topics, Learnist’s lack of visibility in search results is notable. Secondly, Learnist is accessed by a registration process requiring username, password and an email address. These qualifiers get you into the Learnist community.
By contrast, Wikipedia has no such requirements. Instead, it is open-entry: no username/password are required, and Wikipedia contains its own search line for other articles within Wikipedia (as does Learnist). Though Wikipedia makes no strong claims to the title, they are arguably ‘the biggest game in town’ for a single, open access information source, as these recent statistics* show:
Pages: 35,175,208
Active users: 142,472
Articles: 4,727,019
Users: 24,168,748
*Wikipedia Statistics
Wikipedia’s target audience is “whosoever will,” i.e., anyone who wants to find out something about anything else. Jimmy Wales, founder of Wikipedia, stated in a 2005 video that his vision was for “…every person on the planet [to be] given access to all knowledge… a free encyclopedia, empowering people everywhere to make good decisions,” based on free access to all knowledge. The Guardian’s 2/7/2014 article on Wales stated that by 2014, Wikipedia was the 5th most popular website on earth. Wikipedia’s growth shows no signs of slowing down, even though the site layout bears a lot of resemblance to Web 1.0 format. The bells and whistles are accessed when an article author links them to their article.
Wikipedia is open-source: anyone can post an article to Wikipedia, and content is policed by notes at the top of the page stating, “this article has issues,” implying that content is either not researched enough or has tell-tale signs of bias. (This note often appears at the top controversial political or cultural articles which by nature have high potential for subjective viewpoint.)
By contrast, Learnist’s focus is more narrow, being defined by Farbood Nivi’s vision for an online education format. Learnist, as its name implies, sets out to offer learning to its visitors. But because of Nivi’s own views on what constitutes an education (social in nature) and how people are actually educated (again, socially), the tone on Learnist is inviting and conversational. You are invited in to hear and see what someone else has to say on Learnist. The authors are all identified on Learnist whereas in Wikipedia, the authors are always anonymous, however numerous their named research sources are. It should be noted as well that certain Learnist articles are only accessed through ‘pay per view’ and these articles are designated “PREMIUM” as in ‘premium’ Learnist edition. The idea seems to be that if an article is for sale, greater pains are taken to write it and it’s more likely to be accurate. And the vetting process for articles submitted to Learnist seems to be more strict.
More in the next blog on another competitor to Learnist. in the next post. Click here for a few of Farbood Nivi’s ideas on what he sees Learnist providing to the online community.